A World Without Words: An Open Letter to The New York Daily News

I’d like you, gentle reader, to take a moment and imagine something really horrific.

Imagine a world where words are the only accepted form of currency. Your ability to secure food, shelter, meet people, fall in love, raise a family, share the joys and heartaches of being connected to humanity are quite literally bought and sold by your ability to use your own voice. If you don’t have enough words in your account, you can’t even SAY the word “apple,” never mind actually purchase a piece of the fruit in question at a store. You can’t speak. You can’t write. You can sign, grunt and say “Yes” or “no.”

And that is IT.

If you don’t have enough words in your account, you can’t even tell your loved ones how you feel about them. You can’t resolve conflicts or work toward resolution. You move through life in silence, your insignificance reinforced by the billions of pointless words wasted by those in power every day to say nothing at all.

You can’t speak. You can’t write. You can’t even express yourself through art. Everything has been trademarked, bought up, mergered, anti-trusted and mergered again until the only people who can speak at all are politicians and corporations. Choosing the limited words you can use wisely can mean the difference between eating and starvation, medical care and death.

This sounds ludicrous, doesn’t it?

But it isn’t.

In the past week, since May 4th, we have seen an author trademark (not copyright, as Leonard Greene claimed) the word “cocky” and use the questionable filing as a club to suppress competition in her lane. We have also witnessed a video game company who quite literally tried to trademark the word “rebellion” as applied to absolutely everything under the sun.

Most of all, we have seen the indie writing community, especially the romance sector, rise up in arms to combat the beginning of the death of the right to express oneself freely and openly, beholden to no one.

Writers organize. We are nonpareils at research. In the past week, many of us have taken the time to examine filings, case law, trademark statutes and regulations, acquiring formidable educations in the nuances of trademark law. I’m not saying we’re qualified to be lawyers in most cases, by any means, but we most certainly could assist our advocates in their advocacy of our intellectual property and freedom of speech.

In the New York Daily News article posted at 9:07pm last night, Leonard Greene’s treatment of #cockygate and the ensuing fallout overlooked all these important points and factors. He reduced a legitimate uprising against the privatization of language, with its far-reaching First Amendment implications which even touch the established press and publishing industries, to a mere catfight, of no more significance or consequence than a handful of women brawling outside a bar over who got to the hot guy first.

As a cishet male romance author, I find this characterization deeply offensive on a number of levels. It was a male author and retired intellectual property attorney who initiated the challenge to the cocky trademark. While many of the voices raised in protest over #cockygate and its ensuing sequel, #rebelliongate, certainly were women, there’s much more to it.  Cishet men, the entire LGTBQ spectrum, all races, all religions or lack thereof have been represented.

We all united in one voice for one cause: the freedom to speak.

The freedom to use our stock in trade without having to pay tribute to someone else who has decided the English language is up for sale.

There were so many worthwhile and important ways this story could have been told. Should have been told. And needed to be told.

But Leonard Greene and the New York Daily Times failed abysmally to capture the very real, very serious issues at hand in favor of a derogatory, ill-informed and frankly repugnant slur against romance authors and their sensitive feelings. I’m sure he believed he was being satirical or even witty, but between the hackneyed tropes and focus on authors behaving badly, he only managed to demonstrate a sneer.

The article infantilized women, the romance genre, and the very serious nature of the threat to the right to speak, create and write as we wish. I would have expected a representative of the free press, whose very livelihood and ability to do his job is tied to the broader issue we are fighting against, to dig deeper than a cursory, “What are these wacky women up to now?” leer.

And frankly I feel an apology, and a more serious treatment of #cockygate for its broader implications, is very much in order.

13 thoughts on “A World Without Words: An Open Letter to The New York Daily News

    1. Thank you, Randine. 😊 I really hope this reaches the ears and eyes which need to see it so we can make sure situations like #cockygate aren’t repeated in future, and if they are the motives of the people clapping back are represented fairly and honestly by the people reporting on them.


  1. Well said, my first reaction was it was a freedom of speech issue. To trivialize the a billion-dollar a year industry is unwise. When we pull together, great things happen.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for your kind words, Karen. With as many things as we in the community find to disagree about, you would think that many people looking in one direction would prompt a response closer to “Shit just got real” than “Aww! Look at the dewicate widdle womance authors being totes adorbs with their injured feelers!” But the word’s getting around, and folks in this industry have long memories. 😊


      1. Yes, we do and we aren’t very forgiving when you belittle what we do. If this lunacy isn’t stopped, the whole book industry—traditional and indie—will suffer. We may write romance but it’s a huge sector of the pie, over a billion dollars last year alone.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. As many of my friends have said:
        “Don’t start none, won’t BE none.”
        Romance is a scarily underestimated genre, ditto the people who write it. I have the oddest feeling, which is being vindicated every single hour, that a lot of people will remember not to trifle with those who write in that arena after this. Waking the sleeping giant is NEVER a good idea.


  2. Thank you, thank you, thank you! I am heartily sick of the sneering disdain many heap on the romance genre, including Mr. Greene’s latest exercise in condescension. As you point out, this is an issue that affects every writer. Well said and amen.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank YOU, Lexi. I hope this serves in some small way to redirect the conversation to the real issues in play, instead of belittling authors because we can’t play nice. Thank you for the comment!


  3. From a reader of many genres, not just romance, well said and thank you.

    I might just check out your books, especially if they are as well-written as this open letter.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you, Jenni! I like to think they are…but then that’s every author’s hope, isn’t it? 😊I appreciate the comment and hope you have a wonderful day!


  4. Hello and greetings from Mexico. I try to follow this madness since a bookblog mentioned it three days ago. Also I’m following the situation on Twitter and reading articles. Also I published a huge rant about it con Steemit; it’s written in my mother language, but in these days I hope to write another post there and here in both languages, this time a reflection about it.

    Now, my conclusion about this madness is this: that woman deserves no attention, deserves to be issued for financial damages and plagiarism since she not only damaged authors but also robbed a design (the cocky logo) knowing that it was copyrighted by its author.

    The situation clearly is a scary precedent not only in the USA. If it could, it would be also a worldwide precedent, provoking that some crazy people from any country decide to think they would be able to trademark a common use word.

    Hope this madness get a happy ending and that that woman pay for the damages. Cheerings and huge support from México!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. ¡Buenas dias desde los Estados Unidos, y gracias por sus palabras simpaticos, Vicka! Esta locura ha puesto de relieve un problema definido dentro de la ley de marcas registradas de los Estados Unidos. Es muy triste, pero espero que esta situación indique exactamente la necesidad de cambio y reforma en la ley de propiedad intelectual. !Por favor disculpe mi espanol peor, y gracias por sus pensamientos!

      Good morning from the United States, Vicka, and thank you for your kind words! This madness has definitely highlighted a problem with trademark law in the United States. It is very sad, but I hope that this situation indicates the need for change and reform in intellectual property law. Please excuse my poor Spanish, and thanks for your thoughts!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.